YVR18-113:Where did my storages speed go

Vendors steadily provide faster and faster storage, evidently meeting a demand for higher speed and lower latency. Yet Linux easily throws most of this speed away, in all use cases where multiple entities compete for the same storage. Examples are:

  • a host with several active virtual machines or containers;
  • a server–of any kind–serving multiple clients, and possibly executing other administrative tasks at the same time.

The cause of this speed loss is as follows. I/O control is the only solution for providing at least some minimum fairness or bandwidth guarantees, needed in the above use cases. But, as we show in this presentation, I/O control easily slows storage down, to even just 10% of the available speed. This major loss is particularly problematic on lower-end storage, as well as on heavily loaded systems.

The BFQ I/O scheduler now recovers this throughput loss, but only in part of the problematic scenarios. Fortunately, we show that an improvement, still under development, seems to enable BFQ to reach a high throughput with all workloads we tested so far. Paradoxically, the gain is so high to make fully utilized lower-end storage outperform underutilized higher-end media, depending on the hardware at hand.

comments powered by Disqus

Other Posts

Sign up. Receive Updates. Stay informed.

Sign up to our mailing list to receive updates on the latest Linaro Connect news!